She Can Hurt You

Who are these men?  Where do they come from?  What forces form them?  Is it nature?  Is it nurture?

Is there a specific set of childhood variables that must exist in certain quantities in order to produce these men?

We must admit that one attribute that these men have in common is ignorance.  As children, during the formative years, they must have been ignorant and unaware of situations where women hurt men.  Oh sure, we’ve all heard of poor John Bobbitt’s pain, but, seriously, what man considers amputation a likely outcome that need be guarded against?  In fact, there’s probably a man somewhere who has created some statistic which proves that the chance of a woman cutting a man is less than getting struck by lightning.

And men are proud creatures, the lot of them.  And rightfully so.  Is that it then?  Can we point the finger at an adult man’s pride?  (A father’s pride?)  Is pride the causal factor?  Is pride the reason that he wouldn’t share with young men that a woman had hurt him?  Or maybe he, the adult man, had never owned up to himself that she had hurt him?  Is this whole mess created by a simple lie?  Is it created by simple denial?  A virtual, “She didn’t hurt me.  I wanted to break up.  I hadn’t liked her for a while anyhow.  I can do better”?

Whatever the causes, I haven’t been able to figure out what words would get through to these men–or as Heat puts it, “All you are is a child growin’ older!”–these men who rush into relationships with women.  And no ‘mounta nothin’ cn talk ’em outta it–don’ matta who doin’ da sayin’.  I know, because I was one of them.  And then I almost repeated the mistake.  And then almost repeated it again.  And if I didn’t have such a hatred for patterns, I probably would’ve rinsed and repeated for the rest of my life.

Enter “old people”.

Turns out, they can hold their own in conversation.  And they’ve got, by definition, no shortage of experiences to back up the talk.  And I was looking for answers, ready to try anything.

So after a lot of listening, and a lot of thinking, the answer finally appeared.  I believe that I am invincible to women.  Or, rather, I believed I was invincible to women.  No longer.  Now, I know the truth.  Women are just as capable of hurting men as men are of hurting women.

So fellas (you know who you are), I have broken down the (our) problem as simply as I know how.  We need to acknowledge the simple, unbearable truth.  This truth is captured by four words, though I think its most effective delivery comes with repeating the words four times in a row, emphasizing a different word each time.

She can hurt you.  She can hurt you.  She can hurt you.  She can hurt you.

What’s the rush?

PS – As a reminder, hurt doesn’t feel good.

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Elliani

    Great insights. Great post. Loved the ending of repeating the four words with different emphasis. It takes incredible courage for a man to vocalize this truth, more so than a woman because societally we are in the dark ages when it comes to accepting the truth about emotional abuse. I applaud any man with the courage to speak about it and fight against it. Kudos! (Btw, anyone can hurt you…male, female, parent, child, bosses, co-workers, employee.)

    Like

  2. Larry

    Elliani’s Btw sums it up. So the only option is to never take a chance? Life on this earth is about mitigating risk. If you never risk getting hurt, you never experience the opposite of hurt which is joy. Both are unexpected, you never know when they may surprise you, no matter how much you think you are in control.

    It might be as simple as sitting through nine innings of losing baseball, just for that one second of walk off Grand Slam. Was it worth it? That small second of joy for the hours of pain? Every individual has to decide if they can take it, in every one of life’s experiences. (every Day, every Hour, every Minute, every Second)

    Like

    • A Mugwump

      I can’t disagree with your overall point, (what human could?), but it doesn’t fit this post’s subject matter. For some reason, it seems that, at least within 21st century American culture (the only one I’m privy too), there is a fairly fixed courting time-requirement before we’d ever say that “they’re not rushing” into anything. And that means that we all think men and women can, in fact, rush into things. And the implication is that with something as tricky/difficult as love there can be unpleasant results that we generally think should be avoided, and the way to avoid them is to not rush. That said, some men (and women) still rush. My question remains, “Why?”

      Again, culturally speaking, we’re led to believe that the joy of marriage is worth the risk of marriage. You’re certainly not arguing that the marriage joy is so great it’s worth rushing into, are you? Sticking with baseball, that’d be like putting a guy who has never played the game in front of a Cy Young award winning pitcher and saying, “Oh boy! Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy! Just imagine what it would be like if he actually manages to get a hit!” when everyone knows the more likely outcome will be some form of injury either from poor form, or mis-timing the occasionally required duck.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s